- An Israeli legal organization, Shurat HaDin (Israel Law Center), is threatening legal action against the Canadian Museum for Human Rights over plans to host an exhibit on the Nakba, the mass expulsion of Palestinians when Israel was formed in 1948. The exhibit isn't scheduled to open for months, but the organization has vowed to "seek instructions to pursue all available legal remedies" if the museum goes ahead with it. The legal basis for this seems rather tenuous, but several pro-Israel organizations are angry that they weren't consulted about the matter. I have to wonder if they'd be calling for Russia to be consulted over an exhibit about the Holodomor.
- Andy Burnham, the chief challenger to Keir Starmer's leadership, says that he will not pursue readmission to the EU if he becomes prime minister. This is in contrast to another potential challenger, Wes Streeting, who says he would like to see the UK rejoin. Some in this Reddit thread feel betrayed by Burnham's stance, but one poster made a very good point:
Tbh supporting the EU at this point is not a valid policy and is purely performative. You can say that you would want to join the EU, but it’s currently off the table.
With a Reform premiership likely, you would just be wasting 3 years unless there was significant evidence to show rejoining the EU could win you the election.
The EU know this and won’t bother negotiating.
I suspect that this is Burnham's reasoning. Can't really fault it, unfortunately.
- Thomas Massie, the Kentucky Republican who had challenged Trump on the Epstein files, was defeated in his primary yesterday by Trump-backed candidate Ed Gallrein, demonstrating the uncanny grip that the orange monster still has on his sheeple. Meanwhile in Louisiana, Republican senator Bill Cassidy suffered the same fate.
- Experienced farmers develop an intimate knowledge of seasonal patterns that help them to optimize their business. However, farmers in many parts of the world are finding that those patterns are breaking down, thanks to climate change. And it is expected that for each additional 1°C for the average temperature, the average available food supply will decrease by about 120 calories per person per day. Of course this will not be equally distributed; the rich countries will experience inflation in food prices while poor countries face starvation. As I've said before, this also poses a conundrum for the left - the old argument that there's enough food for everyone and it just needs to be distributed properly is soon going to become obsolete, and I fear that a lot of leftists are going to be in denial about this fact.
- On the more positive side, it seems that Trump and Netanyahu's reckless attack on Iran is doing what generations of activists couldn't do - pushing the world towards renewable energy. It's enough to make a person wish that Cheney and Rumsfeld had succeeded in convincing Bush to attack Iran back in the noughties - that way the shift to green energy would have happened two decades earlier and so maybe climate change wouldn't be as bad as it's going to be.